So for me I'm still going to be doing WACUP as a 'classic' Winamp-like experience is what I want (even if others don't or think they don't based on the comments I've seen) & in my mind anything coming from RN/AV isn't imho "Winamp" as it was known. To a lot that probably doesn't matter & just having the name slapped on something is all they're going to want but I strongly don't see anything that is going to come from them which has a true 'classic' Winamp-like experience. My current view is that their "Winamp" which assuming it even happens as noted there's been a number of false reports of new things coming & an incomplete abandoned beta is all there is to show for it is not Winamp as I'd want to it to be. Don't spend your dev time and money on something which already exists (Its called Milkdrop Audrey.) But we like it fast and CPU/OS efficient. I dont want you to connect with me, I'll let you know if I want to.Īnd yes some of us like "Blobby gradient experiences" 😂, thanks Audrey. We'll help you to connect closely with your fans" " artists and audio creators we're all about giving you control over your content. But a number of us care about features/functionalities and developers listening to users, not marketers.Īlso, I'd bet that a lot of us still use it because we want to have control over the media we listen to, not the other we around: I'm pretty sure most people still using Wacup/Winamp don't give a **** about funky marketing crap and new logos.
WINAMP PREPARES RELAUNCH SOFTWARE
I guess what some organizations dont understand when acquiring software is the user profile of people actually using the product and their motivations/expectations.
0 kommentar(er)
